We argue that accuracy-theoretic considerations still tell the risk-sensitive to update by conditionalization.
This argues that evidence gathering is epistemically irrational for the (Buchak-style) risk-avoidant agent. To do this we consider how accuracy should be measured once risk-awareness is rationally permissible.
For more details, email me.
What do measures of accuracy which are risk-weightedly strictly-proper look like? Some results.