We argue that the model of probabilities needs revising when non-classical logics are considered. For strong-Kleene logic we suggest a belief-pair, and for supervaluational logic adopt imprecise probability.
What do measures of accuracy which are risk-weightedly strictly-proper look like? Some results.
We suggest that accuracy considerations should apply to the imprecise by using: what a set recommends is the set of what the individuals in it recommend. This results in a surprisingly nice picture of accuracy for the imprecise.
What does the space of all possible worlds look like? Especially when we have beliefs-about-beliefs.